Marketing Ops Journal

Insights & Tips

Already a subscriber? Login

Become a subscriber and unlock an information arsenal focused on building effective marketing operations.

Why “Defining a Lead” Isn’t Enough

There’s a lot of talk in the space about sales and marketing departments needing to agree on the definition of a qualified lead.

Most often, the discussion centers around reaching agreement as to when a prospect should be turned over to the sales team for more concerted effort and personalized attention. And, this usually involves establishing some combination and accumulation of demonstrated interest, typically manifesting in a certain lead score or cultivation stage.

But while this is certainly a prudent and necessary step toward making the best use of your resources, it’s not sufficient—because it only addresses part of the equation.

Intuitively, you know that even qualified leads are not all created equal. A quick review of your pipeline performance data will no doubt reveal that different types of opportunities, though qualified, have inherently different performance characteristics. A deeper analysis will show that certain combinations of prospect, product, and circumstances have higher close rates, shorter sales cycles, more revenue, higher margins, greater LTVs, etc.

To be most efficient, of course you need to allocate your resources toward prospects with true purchase intent. But to be most effective, you also need to focus your marketing and sales efforts toward those opportunities where:

  1. Your chances of winning the business are much higher, and…
  2. The value of actually winning the business is much greater.

This is what targeting is all about: Zeroing-in on prospects and opportunities that are inherently better for your business and proactively rigging the pipeline to your advantage from the very start.

So first and foremost, sales and marketing teams need to agree on the targets.

Together, they need to define which types of prospects and opportunities are most advantageous to attract and cultivate in the first place. They need to get beyond generic descriptions like “the Fortune 2000” or “technology companies” and be very specific about the makeup of opportunities that should be pursued…and those that should be avoided.

Then, after a solid strategic foundation has been laid, they can of course reach agreement on the tactical details around the marketing-to-sales handoff.

Discover the exclusive tools and research that subscribers get access to.

Take Our Quick Tour

Related Resources

  • How to Deliver Sales Training That Sticks

    With the right approach, a sales training program can deliver lasting, profitable results. This step-by-step process guides you through designing effectiveness and stickiness into your sales training program right from the start.

    View This Tutorial
  • Step-by-Step Competitive Analysis

    How to use competitive analysis to identify actionable opportunities to gain strategic advantage, expose competitive gaps, provide differentiation beyond price, and reduce competitive pressures.

    View This Tutorial
  • Competitive Kill Sheet Development Workbook

    To help you gather and distill the essential information to create effective competitive kill sheets, answer the questions in these worksheets with as much detail as possible. An example of a fictitious competitive kill sheet is provided at the end of the workbook.

    View This Tool
  • The Benefits of Measurement and Accountability

    Robin Caputo, CMO of Datavail, discusses what her team has been doing to fuel profitable growth. Along the way, you'll hear Robin's unique philosophy on marketing results and measurement---it's a mindset that more B2B marketers should adopt, if they hope to survive and thrive.

    View This Interview